A Pilot Test of an Educational Video for Tumor-Normal Paired Genetic Testing in Pediatric Oncology: Acceptability and Implementation Barriers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Interdisciplinary Centers, Units and Projects::Center for Undergraduate Research and Fellowships (CURF)::Fall Research Expo
Degree type
Discipline
Psychology
Medical Sciences
Subject
Cancer Predisposition
Pediatric Oncology
Behavioral Oncology
Implementation Science
Funder
Grant number
Copyright date
2025-09-12
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Amper, Charlize
Poliakova, Polina
King-Dowling, Sara
MacFarland, Suzanne
Schwartz, Lisa A.
Contributor
Abstract

Background: Tumor-Normal Paired (TNP) Genetic Testing is often recommended for children diagnosed with cancer to diagnose cancer predisposition and guide treatment. Educational videos can provide supplemental information to increase understanding of testing. This project aimed to describe caregiver-reported acceptability of a TNP educational video, as well as barriers and facilitators of implementation.

Methods: Caregivers (N=96) with a child newly diagnosed with cancer and receiving TNP genetic testing completed a baseline demographic survey within 1-4 weeks of testing and an acceptability survey within 4-6 weeks of TNP results. TNP video topics included genetic principles, testing process, result categories, legal protections, familial cascade testing, and follow-up recommendations. The TNP video was delivered using a QR code in a brochure upon enrollment. Study staff and caregiver survey feedback about delivery and content of the video were categorized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results: Uptake of the video was initially low (41.7% viewed the video before the follow up survey); the video was later embedded into the follow-up survey. Most caregivers endorsed that the video was helpful and easy to understand. Implementation barriers spanned all CFIR categories and included lack of some informational details, video delivery timing, constricted clinical and genetic testing time frame, confusing caregiver understanding, and limited video delivery impacted by QR codes and lack of provider distribution and reminders.

Discussion: The video was widely accepted, but caregivers prefer earlier delivery and varied formats for different audiences. Next steps are to make informed modifications to the video and implementation strategies and further evaluate it.

Advisor
Date of presentation
2025-09-15
Conference name
Conference dates
Conference location
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Penn Undergraduate Research Mentoring (PURM) program
Recommended citation
Collection