Backlash: The Politics and Real-World Consequences of Minority Group Dehumanization
Penn collection
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
meta-dehumanization
prejudice
intergroup relations
meta-perceptions
2016 U.S. Election
Donald Trump
American Politics
Cognition and Perception
Cognitive Psychology
Communication
Community Psychology
Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication
International and Intercultural Communication
Mass Communication
Personality and Social Contexts
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Social Influence and Political Communication
Social Psychology
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract
Research suggests that members of advantaged groups who feel dehumanized by other groups respond aggressively. But little is known about how meta-dehumanization affects disadvantaged minority group members, historically the primary targets of dehumanization. We examine this important question in the context of the 2016 U.S. Republican Primaries, which have witnessed the widespread derogation and dehumanization of Mexican immigrants and Muslims. Two initial studies document that Americans blatantly dehumanize Mexican immigrants and Muslims; this dehumanization uniquely predicts support for aggressive policies proposed by Republican nominees, and dehumanization is highly associated with supporting Republican candidates (especially Donald Trump). Two further studies show that, in this climate, Latinos and Muslims in the United States feel heavily dehumanized, which predicts hostile responses including support for violent versus non-violent collective action and unwillingness to assist counterterrorism efforts. Our results extend theorizing on dehumanization, and suggest that it may have cyclical and self-fulfilling consequences.