Proceedings of the 47th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference

Volume
30
Number
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Date Published
2024
Journal Volume
Journal Volume
Description
Keywords

Filters

21
202421
21
21
Reset filters

Settings

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 21
  • Publication
    Effects of Talker’s Dialect Labeling and Listener’s Language Experience on the Perception of Nasal Codas in Shanghai Mandarin
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Gao, Xin
    This study delves into the impacts of both talker dialect labeling and listener language experience on the perception of a phonetically ambiguous nasal coda among Shanghai Mandarin speakers. Through a matched-guise online perception experiment, we explore how these factors influence speech perception. Our results indicate that greater exposure to a specific linguistic variety leads to a closer alignment of speech perception patterns with that variety. However, it is noteworthy that, in the context of the present study, talker's dialectal labeling does not appear to wield a significant influence on speech perception.
  • Publication
    Preface
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Chan, May Pik Yu; Choe, June
    The University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL) is an occasional series published by the Penn Graduate Linguistics Society. The series has included volumes of previously unpublished work, or work in progress, by linguists with an ongoing affiliation with the Department, as well as volumes of papers from NWAV and the Penn Linguistics Conference. This volume contains selected papers from the 47th Penn Linguistics Conference, held from March 18-19, 2023 in Philadelphia, PA, at the University of Pennsylvania. All authors of oral presentations were invited to contribute a ten-page paper to this volume. We thank our authors for their contribution and their patience and understanding in this editing process. We also thank Aini Li, Annika Heuser, Christine Soh Yue, Daniel Shevchenko, Daoxin Li, George Balabanian, Gwendolyn Hildebrandt, Hector Vazquez Martinez, Johanna Benz, Mikaela Belle Martin, Muhammed Ileri, Wesley Lincoln, and Xin Gao for their help in editing. Since Vol. 14.2, PWPL has been an internet-only publication. As of September 2014, the entire back catalog has been digitized and made available on ScholarlyCommons@Penn. Please continue citing PWPL papers or issues as you would a print journal article, though you may also provide the URL of the manuscript. An example is below: Abirou, Lena, Aly Kerrigan, Jay Michell, and Lacey Wade. 2024. New and Changing Social Evaluations of All-lowercase and Exclamation Points. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 30.1, ed. May Pik Yu Chan and June Choe, 1-10. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/entities/journalissue/98e2d8f4-c27a-4b90-8c8e-ac58e7f19a0b. Publication in the University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (PWPL) does not preclude submission of papers elsewhere; copyright is retained by the author(s) of individual papers. The PWPL editors can be contacted at: U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, 3401-C Walnut Street, Suite 300, C Wing, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6228 and working-papers@ling.upenn.edu. May Pik Yu Chan and June Choe, Issue Editors
  • Publication
    Prosody Reveals Syntactic Structure: Secondary Predication in Finite Metrical Corpora
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Caso, Anabelle
    The mapping of syntax to prosody is regulated by correspondence requirements that hold between abstract syntactic structure and prosodic structure (Selkirk 2011, Elfner 2012, Ito and Master 2013, among others). Cross-linguistically, secondary predicates can be marked with special prosody indicative of their complex syntactic-semantic structure (Winkler 1997, Guzzo and Goad 2017). Serbian and Modern Irish provide two unique examples of this, demonstrating differential sentential stress and initial mutation application between secondary predicate and attributive adjectival constructions, respectively. In ancient languages with extant metrical corpora, prosodically marked structures are encoded via positions of isolation in a line (Hale and Kissock 2021). The goal of this paper is to demonstrate consistency in the distribution of secondary predicates in the RigVeda and the Homeric poems—secondary predicates are prosodically isolated structures, and are therefore prosodically marked. I show that the tendency to prosodically isolate secondary predicates in metrical texts is indicative of their treatment in non-metrical prose. I conclude that secondary predicates in the Vedic and Ancient Greek languages were prosodically marked structures with relative syntactic-semantic complexity, placing these languages into the cross-linguistic typology of secondary predication.
  • Publication
    Every Provides an Implicit Comparison Class When Each Does Not
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Knowlton, Tyler; Schwarz, Florian
    Although the English universal quantifiers "each" and "every" are highly similar, it's often noted that "each" is 'more individualistic' than "every" in some way. In a recent proposal, outlined in Knowlton (2021), this difference is explained in terms of distinct lexical meanings. The idea is essentially that the meaning of an expression like "every frog" has a semantic constituent that corresponds to the plurality "the frogs", whereas the meaning of "each frog" introduces no such plural element. The bulk of the evidence in support of this view comes from sentence verification tasks (e.g., participants recall group properties, like average frog color and the number of frogs, after evaluating sentences like "every frog is green" better than after evaluating corresponding sentences with "each"). To broaden the empirical landscape, we test a novel prediction of this semantic proposal: since the mental representation that serves as the meaning of "every" calls for grouping the things quantified over, that group representation should be available to serve as the comparison class for predicates like "is the same color" and as a plural antecedent for predicates like "was told that they should jointly select a winner". We show that this prediction is borne out in a simple forced choice judgment study: "every NP" is preferred over "each NP" in both cases, at least relative to baseline preferences for using either quantifier.
  • Publication
    Adults Behaving Childishly: Errors in Adult Responses to Wh-Questions
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Lutken, Jane; Stromswold, Karin
    English speaking kindergarteners sometimes incorrectly answer questions with medial wh-relativizers by apparently responding to the relativizer. For example, they might answer How did Lewis tell Sally what he picked? by saying what was picked (e.g., apples). In other words, they interpret it to mean: What did Lewis tell Sally (that) he picked? These errors are reminiscent of the wh-scope marking (WSM) construction found in languages like German, where the true wh-phrase appears medially while the scope of the wh-phrase is marked by an initial, contentless wh-phrase (Lutz, Muller, & von Stechow, 2000). deVilliers and Roeper (1995) argue these errors are due to children having an immature WSM-like grammar, whereas Lutken, Legendre, and Omaki (2020) argue they are due to immature processing. If children’s errors are due to an immature grammar, adults should not make WSM errors because their grammars are fully developed. If children’s WSM errors stem from their language processors being overtaxed, adults might also make WSM errors if they are similarly overtaxed. We present the results of two experiments in which we taxed adults’ processing mechanisms and examined their responses to questions with medial wh¬-relativizers. Adults read short, yet complex stories and answered questions following them. We also included a working memory task which adults did simultaneously in Experiment 1. We found that adults did make WSM errors in both experiments and they did so at a rate similar to children. Furthermore, adults were more likely to make errors – and WSM errors, specifically – when they simultaneously did the WM task. We suggest that our findings are consistent with an immature processing account of these errors.
  • Publication
    Phorhépecha Clitics: Person Splits and Omnivorous Number
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Aitha, Akshay; Kurtz, Naomi
    We investigate the complexities of clitic agreement patterns in Phorhépecha (language isolate, Michoacán). We show that clitics in the language display a preference for agreeing with participant objects in monotransitive sentences: whenever the object is a participant, regardless of the person features of the subject, clitics invariably agree with the object and not the subject. Further, we demonstrate that clitics exhibit omnivorous number agreement (Nevins 2011). A single morphological marker of plurality on clitics surfaces when two conditions hold: (1) whenever a subject, object, or both are plural, and (2) if the object is a participant. If the object is third person, clitics do not display omnivorous number agreement, and instead agree solely with the subject. We argue that these complex and interrelated patterns of agreement are due to relatively simple syntactic mechanisms. Firstly, we submit that clitics themselves are functional heads (following Sportiche 1996) that probe for person and number. Secondly, we propose that participant objects undergo object shift to a position above subjects and closer to the person probe on clitics, which, we maintain, captures the preference of clitics to agree with participant objects. Thirdly, we attribute omnivorous number agreement to a relativized number probe on clitics, which searches for any plural argument (subjects and objects) within the probe's c-command domain. Finally, we adduce independent evidence for our movement-based analysis from verbal agreement. In Phorhépecha, verbs agree with plural objects only if those objects are third person. We claim that verbal object agreement arises with third-person objects, and not participant objects, because only the former do not undergo object shift and instead remain in their base positions, from which they are accessible to a number probe within the extended projection of the verb. In contrast, participant objects shift to a higher position and are consequently inaccessible to said number probe.
  • Publication
    Against Evacuation Movement in NP-Ellipsis
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Benz, Johanna; Mendes, Gesoel; Salzmann, Martin
    In this paper, we provide evidence from NP-ellipsis and its remnants against the popular mechanism of evacuation movement, arguing that the mechanism wrongly predicts freezing effects for subextraction from PP-remnants in English, as well as being incompatible with genitive remnants of NP-ellipsis in German, which cannot undergo the movement required to escape ellipsis. We argue for an alternative analysis following a separate research tradition, according to which constituents can survive ellipsis without evacuation movement when they are focused. Modeling ellipsis as an instruction to forgo vocabulary and assuming that this procedure is blocked in focus environments reconciles the availability of certain types of ellipsis remnants with their inability to undergo evacuation movement.
  • Publication
    New and Changing Social Evaluations of All-lowercase and Exclamation Points
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Abirou, Lena; Kerrigan, Aly; Michell, Jay; Wade, Lacey
    This study examines the social evaluations of two variables---all lowercase (compared to standard capitalization) and exclamation point usage (!, !! or none)---in Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC). We present the results of a matched guise experiment investigating social perceptions of various combinations of these two variables when used in SMS text messages. Results reveal a range of social meanings associated with both features. All lowercase is associated with a younger, trendier, more online texter, as predicted based on previous literature, and is also evaluated as more feminine and queer, novel social meanings that are further supported by participants' open-ended judgments of all lower-case. The open-ended responses reveal more nuanced associations of lowercase, specifically indexing a stance of trying hard to appear like you're not trying hard or carefully-calibrated casualness. Exclamation points reveal an incremental evaluative pattern, such that 1 exclamation point is judged as more extroverted, image-oriented, laidback, queer, and feminine than no exclamation points, and evaluations are strengthened for 2 exclamation points. Additionally, 2 exclamation points are seen as particularly trendy and tech-savvy, unlike a single exclamation point. We find limited evidence for significant interactions between all-lowercase, exclamation point usage, and perceived texter gender, but we do observe a general trend for ratings to be stronger, especially for lowercase, among younger participants. We interpret these results as indicating emerging and changing social meanings of all lowercase and exclamation point usage.
  • Publication
    Postverbal gwai in Cantonese: A Syntactic Approach to Rhetorical Questions
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Choi, Tsun Hei
    Rhetorical questions are traditionally considered a pragmatic and semantic issue. In this paper, I discuss the rhetorical expression gwai in Cantonese. By arguing that gwai, though base generated as a postverbal suffix, Agrees with the Speaker Phrase, Addressee Phrase, and Commitment Phrase located at the expressive component above CP, I suggest rhetorical questions may be analysed syntactically. The proposal may even be extended to other rhetorical expressions in Chinese. This study provides a new perspective not only to rhetorical questions and expressive components in the minimalist framework, but also to the study of SFPs and intonation in Cantonese.
  • Publication
    Does Telugu have Wh-movement? Surprising Findings from Native Speakers
    (University of Pennsylvania, 2024-04-20) Lutken, Jane; Dharmpuri, Anhiti; Stromswold, Karin
    Telugu is a Dravidian language with subject-object-verb (SOV) word order. It is classically described as a wh-in-situ language (Bruening 2007, Subba Rao 2012), and consistent with this, object questions always have SOV word order. However, interviews with native Telugu-speaking adults suggest that Telugu may allow subject questions to have either SOV or OSV word order. Because object topicalization is allowed in Telugu declaratives (Davis, 2005), OSV subject questions could be the result of object-fronting in topicalized contexts. Alternatively, if Telugu has partial wh-movement (Jayaseelan 2001, 2008, Balusu, 2016), this would license OSV subject questions. We conducted a yoked judgment/production experiment in which 17 Telugu-speaking adults read brief stories that either did or did not support object topicalization. After each story, participants chose whether they thought the SOV or OSV version of a sentence fit the story context best, and then they said their choice aloud. Bayesian analyses of the judgment results revealed that, although Telugu-speakers chose both SOV and OSV options for subject questions, they preferred OSV subject questions after both topicalizing and non-topicalizing stories. In contrast, they preferred SOV declaratives, particularly after non-topicalizing stories. Acoustic analyses suggest that, whereas OSV declaratives involved object topicalization, OSV subject questions did not. Taken as a whole, these results indicate that Telugu OSV subject questions are not the result of object topicalization, but may be the result of partial wh-movement. While further research is needed to determine why SOV and OSV subject questions coexist in Telugu, this study demonstrates that OSV subject questions are an acceptable option – and perhaps even the preferred option – in Telugu.