Neighborhood Cancerization: New Approaches Linking Social and Biological Mechanisms of Cancer

Contributor
Abstract

Novel multidisciplinary and multilevel approaches are required to link biologic and social mechanisms with cancer. We propose a new biosocial concept, "neighborhood cancerization," which postulates that residents of the same geographically-defined regions can be exposed to common unfavorable circumstances. These common neighborhood-level exposures can in turn have biological consequences that may result in an increased risk of cancer. Just as common "molecular signatures" can differentiate tumor types, "neighborhood signatures" can identify neighborhoods at increased risk for cancers of similar etiologic origins. Under a shared chronic stress hypothesis, we test the neighborhood cancerization theory by first determining the effect of neighborhood circumstances on telomere length (TL), a cellular marker of oxidative stress often implicated in cancer development at the population level. After addressing common methodologic concerns often cited in TL studies, we tested neighborhood and TL associations in a multi-racial, multi-center setting and in the context of individual-level stressors using quantile regression. We then developed and conducted a neighborhood-wide association study (NWAS) using all available U.S Census variables and the Pennsylvania State Cancer Registry in order to empirically identify common neighborhood factors related to prostate cancer. Our novel NWAS approach demonstrates how agnostic, high-dimensional data analyses can be used to identify neighborhoods and people at risk for high grade/high stage, aggressive prostate cancer. Our work has implications for health disparities research, and provides evidence to support the neighborhood cancerization hypothesis.

Advisor
Timothy R. Rebbeck
Date of degree
2015-01-01
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation