Evaluating the Moral and Legal Considerations of Banning Cashless Businesses
Penn collection
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
cashless business
cashless payment
discrimination
economic inclusion
financial inclusion
public accommodations
disparate impact
disparate treatment
retail
restaurant
undue burden
Business
Business Administration, Management, and Operations
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Civil Rights and Discrimination
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract
Prior to 2019 in the United States, zero cities and only one state—Massachusetts—banned businesses from refusing cash payments. However, beginning in January 2019, countless cities and states began proposing or instituting bans on cashless businesses including New Jersey and Rhode Island, as well as Philadelphia, San Francisco, and New York City. Many lawmakers have joined this wave of bans under the perception that businesses refusing cash payments exclude and, by extension, discriminate against certain groups, including low-income or undocumented individuals. This paper examines the different rationale that can be applied to cashless business bans. Specifically, this research provides a legal overview to public accommodations and the standard for upholding a ban intended to prevent discrimination. The paper then goes on to apply an “Undue Burden Test” to cashless payment policies to identify whether accepting cash poses an undue burden to businesses. Utilizing existing scholarly research, news articles, and reports, this paper draws conclusions on the viability of cashless business bans and introduces potential responses to the burden accepting cash payments might cause.