The Role of Company Stock in Defined Contribution Plans

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Wharton Pension Research Council Working Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Economics
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

This paper explores the risks and benefits of holding company stock in employer-sponsored defined contribution (DC) retirement plans. We address three questions: (1) What is the role and function of company stock in such plans? (2) Who might be affected by enhanced portfolio diversification in such plans? and (3) What mechanisms exist, or might be developed, to enhance portfolio diversification if more diversification were deemed useful? Firms offer company stock within DC plans in an effort to enhance economic performance, though evidence is mixed on productivity gains from stock ownership. We demonstrate that concentrated stock positions arise most often in larger firms’ DC plans where sponsors direct employer contributions and restrict diversification. Stock concentration also arises because participants systematically underestimate the risk of employer stock and over-rely on its past performance in making investment decisions. In a retirement system with concentrated stock positions, there will always be some participants who forfeit DC plan savings to firm bankruptcy. Encouraging plan diversification mitigates this risk, but it could also induce some companies to redirect plan contributions to other forms of stock compensation or to replace stock contributions with cash compensation. We conclude by describing policy tools that might be used to encourage diversification and discuss conditions for their effective implementation.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2002-01-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
The authors are grateful for comments provided by Shlomo Benartzi, Richard Hinz, Doug Kruse, Nick Souleles and Jack VanDerhei; and for research assistance from Kathleen Callan, Walter Lenhard, William Nessmith, and James Troyer of Vanguard. Financial support for this research was provided by the National Bureau of Economic Research and the Pension Research Council. This study is part of the NBER program on the Economics of Aging. The published version of this Working Paper may be found in the 2003 publication: The Pension Challenge: Risk Transfers and Retirement Income Security. https://pensionresearchcouncil.wharton.upenn.edu/publications/books/the-pension-challenge-risk-transfers-and-retirement-income-security/
Recommended citation
Collection