Keeping Up Appearances: Reputational Threat and Impression Management after Social Movement Boycotts

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Management Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
social movements
boycotts
media attention
impression management
prosocial claims
threat amplification
nonmarket strategies
Advertising and Promotion Management
Business Administration, Management, and Operations
Business and Corporate Communications
Business Intelligence
Management Information Systems
Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Marketing
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Strategic Management Policy
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
McDonnell, Mary-Hunter
King, Brayden G
Contributor
Abstract

In this paper, we show that corporate targets' responses to social movements are a function of impression management to counteract perceived image threats created by movement tactics. An image threat occurs when an organization‟s audiences or reference publics are given reason to doubt its reliability or claimed conformity to socially acceptable behaviors, norms and values. We examine organizational responses to image threats created by social movement boycotts. Consumer boycotts, while ostensibly trying to cause a decline in a firm's sales revenue and force them to change a policy or practice, have a pronounced negative impact on their targets' public images. Boycotts may elicit increased efforts by the firm to engage in positive impression management and to reinforce positive audience perceptions. We argue that firms frequently use corporate social actions as part of their image repertoire when dealing with the threat of boycotts. Corporate social actions are especially likely to be used by firms that have built their reputation around being a "virtuous” company. We draw on social movement theory and organizational theory to predict the conditions in which firms will respond to boycotts with increased levels of social action. We use a dataset of boycotts that were reported in major national newspapers from 1990 to 2005 to test our hypotheses.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2013-09-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection