When Better Is Worse: Envy and the Use of Deception

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Management Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
negotiations
emotion
ethics
deception
envy
social comparison
Business Administration, Management, and Operations
Business Intelligence
Cognition and Perception
Cognitive Psychology
Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Personality and Social Contexts
Social Psychology
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Moran, Simone
Schweitzer, Maurice E
Contributor
Abstract

In this article, we describe how envy motivates deception. We find that individuals who envy a counterpart are more likely to deceive them than are individuals who do not envy their counterpart. Across both a scenario and a laboratory study, we explore the influence of envy in a negotiation setting. Negotiations represent a domain in which social comparisons are prevalent and deception poses a particularly important concern. In our studies, we induce envy by providing participants with upward social comparison information. We find that upward social comparisons predictably trigger envy, and that envy promotes deception by increasing psychological benefits and decreasing psychological costs of engaging in deceptive behavior. We discuss implications of our results with respect to negotiations and the role of emotions in ethical decision making.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2008-02-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection