Marketing Papers
Document Type
Journal Article
Date of this Version
October 1978
Abstract
This paper examines the additional evidence produced by the seven scientists on each of the issues.The issues were:
(1) "Should econometricians use the method of multiple hypotheses rather than advocacy?" (2) "Do econometric methods provide the most accurate approach to short-range forecasting" (Table 2 of "Folklore versus Fact")? (3) "Are complex econometric methods more accurate than simple econometric methods" (Table 4 of "Folklore versus Fact")?
Recommended Citation
Armstrong, J. S. (1978). Econometric Forecasting and the Science Court. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers/81
Date Posted: 14 June 2007
This document has been peer reviewed.
Comments
Postprint version. Published in Journal of Business, Volume 51, Issue 4, October 1978, pages 595-600.
Publisher URL: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/