Combining forecasts

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Marketing Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
consensus
domain knowledge
earnings forecasts
equal weights
group
Marketing
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

To improve forecasting accuracy, combine forecasts derived from methods that differ substantially and draw from different sources of information. When feasible, use five or more methods. Use formal procedures to combine forecasts: An equal-weights rule offers a reasonable starting point, and a trimmed mean is desirable if you combine forecasts resulting from five or more methods. Use different weights if you have good domain knowledge or information on which method should be most accurate. Combining forecasts is especially useful when you are uncertain about the situation, uncertain about which method is most accurate, and when you want to avoid large errors. Compared with errors of the typical individual forecast, combining reduces errors. In 30 empirical comparisons, the reduction in ex ante errors for equally weighted combined forecasts averaged about 12.5% and ranged from 3 to 24 percent. Under ideal conditions, combined forecasts were sometimes more accurate than their most accurate components.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Book title
Series name and number
Publication date
2001-06-17
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Postprint version. Published in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners, Kluwer Academic Publishing, 2001, pages 417-439. The author asserts his/her right to include this information in ScholarlyCommons@Penn.
Recommended citation
Collection