Ms. Codex 1640 - Manipulus florum peritorum. Video Facsimile

Penn collection
Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies (SIMS): Videos
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Classical literature -- Early works to 1800
Christian literature Early -- Early works to 1800
Christian literature Early
Classical literature
Codices
Anthologies
Commonplace books
Illuminations (visual works)
Manuscripts Latin
Manuscripts Medieval
Classical Literature and Philology
Medieval Studies
Format
youtube
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract
Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2023-01-31
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Cover-to-cover video facsimile (recording of curator Dot Porter turning the pages) of Ms. Codex 1640, a compendium of extracts, mostly from Biblical, patristic, and later Christian literature, categorized by subject with the subjects in alphabetical order, designed as a reference work for use in writing sermons. Most of the subjects are moral and ethical concepts such as abstinence, joy, medicine, obedience, patience, good, evil, man, and woman; or religious terms such as baptism, eternal glory, grace, incarnation, nativity, and priest. Authors frequently quoted include Augustine, Ambrose, Bede, Cassiodorus, Gregory the Great, Hugh of Saint-Victor, Isidore of Seville, and Jerome. Seneca is the classical author most frequently quoted; Cicero is quoted occasionally. Each quotation has an ordinal letter or combination of letters (a-y, aa-ay, etc.) in the left margin and an attribution in the right margin. The compendium is followed by an alphabetical list of subjects (Tabula verborum, f. 196v-198v) and 3 early flyleaves. The first flyleaf is a fragment of a leaf from a near-contemporary antiphonary (in 2 columns with space left for musical notation), which has a hole and rust marks in the center of its lower edge, suggesting that the manuscript was once in a chained library; the remaining flyleaves are a bifolium formed from a fragment from a 14th-century account book (with repeated reference to Stephanus de Barnby). Unfortunately this book is too tightly bound to photograph, but the full record is available on Franklin: https://franklin.library.upenn.edu/catalog/FRANKLIN_9960273183503681
Recommended citation
Collection