A Systematic Approach to Justifying Sufficient Confidence in Software Safety Arguments
Penn collection
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
safety cases
confidence arguments
assurance deficits
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract
Safety arguments typically have some weaknesses. To show that the overall confidence in the safety argument is considered acceptable, it is necessary to identify the weaknesses associated with the aspects of a safety argument and supporting evidence, and manage them. Confidence arguments are built to show the existence of sufficient confidence in the developed safety arguments. In this paper, we propose an approach to systematically constructing confidence arguments and identifying the weaknesses of the software safety arguments. The proposed approach is described and illustrated with a running example.