Political Affiliation Affects Adaptation to Climate Risks: Evidence from New York City

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Operations, Information and Decisions Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
flood risk
flood damage
political affiliation
Republican party
flood insurance
Business
Business Analytics
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Economic Policy
Emergency and Disaster Management
Environmental Policy
Environmental Studies
Insurance
Management Information Systems
Place and Environment
Technology and Innovation
Urban Studies
Urban Studies and Planning
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Wouter Botzen, W. J
Michel-Kerjan, Erwann
Kunreuther, Howard
de Moel, Hans
Aerts, Jeroen C.J.H
Contributor
Abstract

Research reveals that liberals and conservatives in the United States diverge about their beliefs regarding climate change. We show empirically that political affiliation also matters with respect to climate related risks such as flooding from hurricanes. Our study is based on a survey conducted 6 months after Superstorm Sandy in 2012 of over 1,000 residents in flood-prone areas in New York City. Democrats’ perception of their probability of suffering flood damage is significantly higher than Republicans’ and they are also more likely to invest in individual flood protection measures. However, 50% more Democrats than Republicans in our sample expect to receive federal disaster relief after a major flood. These results highlight the importance of taking into account value-based considerations in designing disaster risk management policies.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2016-09-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection