Ambiguity Attitudes about Investments: Evidence from the Field

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Ambiguity
decision-making under uncertainty
investment
preferences
financial literacy
Economics

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

Using an incentivized survey and a representative sample of investors, we elicit ambiguity attitudes toward a familiar company stock, a local stock index, a foreign stock index, and a crypto currency. We separately estimate ambiguity aversion (ambiguity preferences) and perceived ambiguity levels (perceptions about ambiguity), while controlling for unknown likelihood beliefs. We show that ambiguity aversion is highly correlated across different assets and can be summarized by a single underlying factor. By contrast, individuals’ perceived ambiguity levels differ depending on the type of asset and cannot be summarized by a single underlying factor. Perceived ambiguity is mitigated by financial literacy and education, while the preference component is correlated with risk aversion. Perceived ambiguity proves to be related to actual investment choices, validating our measure. Finally, our results imply that policies enhancing financial literacy and knowledge of financial markets can help stimulate equity market participation and reduce inequality, as these reduce peoples’ perceived levels of ambiguity about financial assets.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2019-02-07

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

This project received funding from NETSPAR, Wharton School’s Pension Research Council/Boettner Center, and Labex Ecodex. The authors thank Stephen Dimmock and Peter Wakker for helpful comments. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the TIAA Institute, the Wharton School’s Pension Research Council/Boettner Center, or the individuals named above.

Recommended citation

Collection