Replication Research in Marketing Revisited: A Note on a Disturbing Trend

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

Over the past decade, researchers have expressed concerns over what seemed to be a paucity of replications. In line with this, editorial policies of some leading marketing journals have been modified to encourage more replications. We conducted an extension of a 1994 study to see whether these efforts have had an effect. In fact, the replication rate has fallen to 1.2 percent, a decrease in the rate by 50%. As things now stand, practitioners should be skeptical about using the results published in marketing journals as hardly any of them have been successfully replicated. Teachers are advised to ignore the findings until they have been replicated, and researchers should put little stock in the outcomes of one-shot studies.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2007-04-01

Journal title

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Comments

Postprint version. Published in Journal of Business Research, Volume 60, Issue 4, April 2007, pages 411-415. Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.003

Recommended citation

Collection