The Challenges of Conscience in a World of Compromise

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Legal Studies and Business Ethics Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Business Administration, Management, and Operations
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Business Organizations Law
Civil Rights and Discrimination
Constitutional Law
First Amendment
Health Law and Policy
Insurance Law
Law
Law and Politics
Organizations Law
Religion Law
Supreme Court of the United States
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

The process of crafting and passing legislation might be thought to be the locus of compromise par excellence.1 Yet, where the law that results impinges upon moral or religious belief or practice, the issue of compromise arises anew, in both senses of the word: Individuals who oppose the law on moral or religious grounds believe that their political obedeience will compromise them in a fundamental way. Their plea for an exemption from the objectionable legal requirement is, then, a bid for further compromise.2 Compromise in the first sense concerns an undercutting of the self, while compromise in the second sense involves a grant of concessions. Yet, unlike compromises that arise in the legislative process, or at least in some ideal version of it,3 the compromise involved in an exemption from a neutral law of general application involves neither an exchange of benefits nor the prospect of mutual benefit-two hallmarks of compromise in, say, political (and other) negotiations.4 There are several reasons to doubt the wisdom or fairness of the requested exemptions, then.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Book title
Series name and number
Publication date
2018-01-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection