Certain emotive predicates have traditionally been analyzed as triggering both a factive and a belief-relative presupposition. In this paper, we explore datapoints that show that these two inferences have a different status, such that the factive presupposition behaves as a cancelable pragmatic inference, but the belief-relative presupposition does not. We offer an account that makes sense of this contrast by introducing a new pragmatic principle, which we call Echochamber, that derives the factive inference from the belief-relative presupposition and unifies these cases with the similar pattern that arises when a presupposition trigger is embedded in the scope of an attitude predicate.