Comparison of Quality Measures from U.S. Teaching Hospitals with Clinically Trained and Non-Clinically Trained Executives

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
The Wharton School::Wharton Undergraduate Research::Wharton Research Scholars
Degree type
Discipline
Business
Subject
Healthcare
Hospital Management
Funder
Grant number
Copyright date
2024
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Catherine Buren
Contributor
Abstract

Background: With increasing emphasis on value-based care, nurses and physicians are being promoted to top administrative roles in US healthcare organizations. Purpose: This study sought to examine whether clinician (nurse or physician) leadership was associated with improved Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grades (HSGs) and Magnet designation. Methodology: Cross-sectional analysis of Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade and Magnet status data on 257 U.S. teaching hospitals was performed. Results: Hospitals in clinician-led hospitals performed better across several safety and performance measures than non-clinician-led hospitals. Magnet designation was independently associated with higher overall HSGs and better performance in several outcome, structure, and process measures. Conclusions: This study suggests that hospital executives with a clinical background may possess skills, knowledge, or management strategies that positively impact patient outcomes. Practice implications: Hospital quality and safety ratings impact patient decisions. Clinician executive leadership may improve hospital performance. Clinical education should prepare nurses and physicians to assume leadership positions in healthcare organizations.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2024-05-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection