Vilanova, John

Email Address
ORCID
Disciplines
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Position
Introduction
Research Interests

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication
    CARGC Briefs Volume I: ISIS Media
    (2019-04-01) Damaj, Yara M.; Degerald, Michael; El Damanhoury, Kareem; Girginova, Katerina; Howard-Williams, Rowan; Hughes, Brian; Salih, Mohammed; Vilanova, John; Youmans, William
    The essays that comprise CARGC Briefs Volume I: ISIS Media began their lives as presentations at a small, by-invitation workshop, “Emerging Work on Communicative Dimensions of Islamic State,” held on May 3-4, 2017 at the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication at the Annenberg School for Communication. Consistent with CARGC’s mission to mentor early-career scholars, the workshop was a non-public event featuring graduate students, some affiliated with the Jihadi Networks of Communication and CultureS (JINCS) research group at CARGC, and others from around the United States and the world, in addition to postdocs and faculty members. Parameters were purposefully broad to encourage independent thought and intellectual exploration: contributors were asked to write short essays focusing on any single aspect of Islamic State that was part of their research. The result is a group of fascinating essays: using mostly primary sources (textual, visual, or audio-visual), examining several media platforms and modalities, considering multiple levels of theoretical deployment and construction, and shedding light on various aspects of Islamic State communication against the broad back drop of history, ideology and geopolitics, the following include some of the most innovative approaches to Islamic State to date, and promise a wave of fresh voices on one of the most important challenges to global order.
  • Publication
    Not Simply The Best: The Grammy Awards, Race, And America
    (2019-01-01) Vilanova, John
    This dissertation critically analyzes the global music industry’s premiere event, the GRAMMY Awards. It takes the mainstream music industry as its object of study, illustrating the ways in which a cultural-industrial apparatus contains within its foundations the myths, symbols, assumptions, and biases of the world in which it operates. The music industry has remained an amorphous object in media industry studies work, and when it has been critically theorized, it has been done so inchoately. Through archival research in the trade press; interviews with journalists, industry workers, and stakeholders; and conceptual theorizing, this project historicizes the discursive and material conditions surrounding the GRAMMYs’ vision of itself and of music. It suggests that industrialized music and its most public-facing event have at their roots a set of under-examined race-based attitudes. Its intention is to further understand further the place of racist and race-based decision-making on the part of the Recording Academy voters and organizational structure throughout the history of the awards show, connecting these decisions to their broader cultural and industrial contexts. This dissertation asks the field of communication studies to consider the extent to which race mediates our industrial and capital relations as well as our mass-mediated soundscape, again considering the discursive and material conditions of the racial state. At the same time, it encourages a renewed emphasis within the field on music as mediated text and race as media, with an emphasis on the popular music industry as a media industry and the GRAMMY Awards as a media event. Ultimately, this dissertation identifies and explicates the institutionalization of racial attitudes, specifically with regard to merit and artistic excellence in music. The history of the GRAMMYs’ determinations of greatness is also a history in which atmospheric racist and race-based attitudes cohere in voters’ opinions of what quality is and is not. This dissertation lays bare an unacknowledged racial politics at the root of what greatness in music might mean. It suggests that mainstream conclusions about artistic excellence ultimately carry and reinforce long-held ideas about coded racial superiority in high/low culture hierarchies and musical genres and styles.