Negotiations Around Power, Resources, and Tasks Within Lesbian Relationships: Does This Process Affect the Perception of Intimacy and Sexual Satisfaction?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Degree type
Doctor of Social Work (DSW)
Graduate group
Discipline
Subject
lesbian relationships
power
sexual satisfaction
intimacy
tasks
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Social Work
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

In an environment typically dominated by heteronormative values and behavior, the distribution of power, resources, and tasks within an intimate relationship often is gender-determined. How power, resources, and tasks are negotiated within a lesbian relationship and how this process may affect the perception of intimacy and sexual satisfaction remains a fertile area for exploration. Through the lens of relational-cultural theory and social exchange theory, this dissertation examines the literature that considers the ways in which power is negotiated and distributed in intimate relationships, with a specific emphasis on lesbian relationships. In addition, literature that considers the interplay between power and perceived intimacy and sexual satisfaction will be analyzed, again with an emphasis on lesbian relationships. Interviews with ten self-identifying lesbians, each of whom is in an exclusive romantic relationship for a minimum of three years, will provide the context for exploring the ways in which power has been negotiated and resources and tasks have been distributed within their relationships—and how, if at all, the negotiation and distribution of power, resources, and tasks has impacted their perceived levels of intimacy and sexual satisfaction.

Advisor
Marcia Martin, PhD
Lina Hartocollis, PhD
Date of degree
2019-05-20
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation