Empirical Analyses Of Regulation And Negotiated Prices

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Degree type
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Graduate group
Economics
Discipline
Subject
Bargaining
Dynamic Games
Regulation
Telecommunications
Vertical Relationships
Economics
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
2021-08-31T20:21:00-07:00
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Granja De Almeida, Joao Vitor
Contributor
Abstract

In the first chapter of this dissertation, I study coverage requirements, a common regulation in the mobile telecommunications industry that intends to accelerate the roll-out of new mobile telecommunications technologies to disadvantaged areas. I argue that the regulation may engender entry deterrence effects that limit its efficacy and lead to technology introduction patterns that are not cost-efficient. To quantify the impact of coverage requirements on market structure and the speed and cost of technology roll-out, I develop and estimate a dynamic game of entry and technologyupgrade under regulation. I estimate the model using panel data on mobile technology availability at the municipality level in Brazil. In counterfactual simulations, I find that coverage requirements accelerate the introduction of 3G technology by just over one year, on average, and reduce firms’ profits by 24% relative to a scenario with no regulation. I find the entry deterrence effects to be small. Moreover, an alternative subsidization policy leads to a similar acceleration in the roll-out of 3G and substantially higher aggregate profits, likely increasing aggregate welfare relative to coverage requirements. In the second chapter, I investigate how the portfolio of products carried by retailers influences wholesale and retail prices. To this end, I develop and estimate a model of retailer pricing and retailer-manufacturer negotiations over wholesale prices. The estimation approach extends existing econometric tools for multi-product bargaining models to a setting with optimal downstream pricing. I use the estimated model to simulate the effects of counterfactual scenarios in which private label products or the products of a national manufacturer are excluded from retailers’ product portfolios. I find that wholesale prices do increase, but those effects are small. Eliminating private label products leads to an average increase in wholesale prices of only 0.10%; retail prices increase by only 0.04%. Eliminating a national manufacturer’s products leads to increases in wholesale prices between 0.003% and 0.677%; retail prices decrease by 0.027%-4.210% due to downstream pricing incentives.

Advisor
Aviv Nevo
Date of degree
2021-01-01
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation