Equilibrium Tuition, Applications, Admissions and Enrollment in the College Market

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Degree type
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Graduate group
Economics
Discipline
Subject
College market
tuition
applications
admissions
enrollment
discrete choice
market equilibrium
multiple equilibria
estimation
Labor Economics
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract

I develop and structurally estimate an equilibrium model of the college market. Students, who are heterogeneous in both abilities and preferences, make college application decisions, subject to uncertainty and application costs. Colleges observe only noisy measures of student ability and set up tuition and admissions policies to compete for more able students. The model incorporates tuition, applications, admissions and enrollment as the joint outcome from a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. I estimate the structural parameters of the model using the NLSY 97 data, via a three-step estimation procedure to deal with potential multiple equilibria. I use the estimated model to perform three counterfactual experiments. First, I explore the impacts of incomplete information on the market. A perfect measure of student ability would lead to higher enrollee ability across colleges and a $2500 increase in average student welfare. Second, I examine the equilibrium consequences of funding cuts to public colleges. All colleges, public and private, increase their tuition, and the drop in student welfare is three times as large as government savings. Finally, I study the extent to which the government can expand college access by increasing the supply of lower-ranked colleges. At most 2.1% more students could be drawn into colleges.

Advisor
Kenneth Wolpin
Antonio Merlo
Philipp Kircher
Date of degree
2010-05-17
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation