Date of this Version
The concept of “system of systems” architecture is increasingly prevalent in many critical domains. Such systems allow information to be pulled from a variety of sources, analyzed to discover correlations and trends, stored to enable realtime and post-hoc assessment, mined to better inform decisionmaking, and leveraged to automate control of system units. In contrast, medical devices typically have been developed as monolithic stand-alone units. However, a vision is emerging of a notion of a medical application platform (MAP) that would provide device and health information systems (HIS) interoperability, safety critical network middleware, and an execution environment for clinical applications (“apps”) that offer numerous advantages for safety and effectiveness in health care delivery.
In this paper, we present the clinical safety/effectiveness and economic motivations for MAPs, and describe key characteristics of MAPs that are guiding the search for appropriate technology, regulatory, and ecosystem solutions. We give an overview of the Integrated Clinical Environment (ICE) – one particular achitecture for MAPs, and the Medical Device Coordination Framework – a prototype implementation of the ICE architecture.
computing platform, medical device, interoperability, safety-critical systems, certification, PRECISE_paper, PRECISE_CPS_Medical
John Hatcliff, Andrew King, Insup Lee, Alasdair MacDonald, Anura Fernando, Michael Robkin, Eugene Vasserman, Sandy Weininger, and Julian M. Goldman, "Rationale and Architecture Principles for Medical Application Platforms", . April 2012.
Date Posted: 14 August 2012
This document has been peer reviewed.