Departmental Papers (CIS)

Date of this Version

10-4-2011

Document Type

Conference Paper

Comments

Seventh International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, Mountain View, California, USA, October 2011.

Abstract

Collaborative environments, such as Wikipedia, often have low barriers-to-entry in order to encourage participation. This accessibility is frequently abused (e.g., vandalism and spam). However, certain inappropriate behaviors are more threatening than others. In this work, we study contributions which are not simply ``undone'' -- but *deleted* from revision histories and public view. Such treatment is generally reserved for edits which: (1) present a legal liability to the host (e.g., copyright issues, defamation), or (2) present privacy threats to individuals (i.e., contact information).

Herein, we analyze one year of Wikipedia's public deletion log and use brute-force strategies to learn about privately handled redactions. This permits insight about the prevalence of deletion, the reasons that induce it, and the extent of end-user exposure to dangerous content. While Wikipedia's approach is generally quite reactive, we find that copyright issues prove most problematic of those behaviors studied.

Subject Area

CPS Internet of Things

Publication Title

7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '11)

First Page

25

Last Page

28

DOI

10.1145/2038558.2038563

Permission Statement

© ACM 2011. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '11), http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038563.

Keywords

Wikipedia, user generated content, collaboration, redaction, content removal, copyright, information security

 

Date Posted: 05 October 2011

This document has been peer reviewed.