Statistics Papers

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of this Version

1990

Publication Source

The Annals of Probability

Volume

18

Issue

3

Start Page

1010

Last Page

133

DOI

10.1214/aop/1176990734

Abstract

Consider two Brownian motions B1s1 and B2s2, each taking values on an interval [0,ai], i = 1,2, with absorption at the endpoints. The time evolution of the two processes can be controlled separately: i.e., we can alternate between letting B1s1 run while freezing B2s2 and letting B2s2 run while freezing B1s1. This results in a switched process that evolves in the rectangle, D=[0,a1]×[0,a2] like a horizontal Brownian motion when B2s2 freezes and like a vertical Brownian motion when B1s1 freezes. Let f(x1,x2) be a nonnegative continuous payoff function defined on the boundary ∂D of D. A control consists of a switching strategy and a stopping time τ. We study the problem of finding an optimal control which maximizes the expected payoff obtained at time τ (stopping in the interior results in zero reward). In the interior of the rectangle, the optimal switching strategy is determined by a partition into three sets: a horizontal control set, a vertical control set and an indifference set. We give an explicit characterization of these sets in the case when the payoff function is either linear or strongly concave on each face.

Keywords

optimal stopping, two-parameter processes, nonlinear Dirichlet problem, optional increasing paths

Included in

Probability Commons

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 27 November 2017

This document has been peer reviewed.