High School Students' Attitudes about Firearms Policies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Departmental Papers (SPP)
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
attitudes
adolescents
firearms
gender differences
guns
Public Health
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

Purpose: To examine high school students’ attitudes about firearm policies and to compare their attitudes with those of adults. Methods: The Hamilton Youth and Guns Poll is the first national survey of high school students about their attitudes concerning firearm policies. Questions were asked of 1005 sophomores, juniors, and seniors about their actual (i.e., direct) exposure (e.g., presence of a gun in the home) and about their social (i.e., indirect) exposure (e.g., whether the student could get a gun) to firearms and related violence. Population weights were applied, and multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between demographic and exposure variables and opinions about firearm policies. Results: Most high school students supported more restrictive firearm policies. Opinions varied little by demographic variables with the exception of gender. Females were significantly more supportive of most firearm policies. Actual exposure was a more consistent predictor than social exposure. Students living in a home with a gun, particularly a handgun, were less likely to support most restrictive gun policies. Conclusions: Most high school students in the United States favor stringent policies governing firearms. Adolescents' attitudes about firearm policies parallel those of adults.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2003-12-01
Journal title
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Postprint version. Published in Journal of Adolescent Health, Volume 33, Issue 6, December 2003, pages 471-478. Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00142-3 NOTE: At the time of publication, authors Katherine A. Vittes and Susan B. Sorenson were affiliated with the University of California. Currently (August 2007), they are faculty members in the School of Social Policy and Practice at the University of Pennsylvania.
Recommended citation
Collection