Real Estate Papers

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of this Version

2010

Publication Source

The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Volume

125

Issue

1

Start Page

215

Last Page

261

DOI

10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.215

Abstract

Despite extensive public infrastructure spending, surprisingly little is known about its economic return. In this paper, we estimate the value of school facility investments using housing markets: standard models of local public goods imply that school districts should spend up to the point where marginal increases would have zero effect on local housing prices. Our research design isolates exogenous variation in investments by comparing school districts where referenda on bond issues targeted to fund capital expenditures passed and failed by narrow margins. We extend this traditional regression discontinuity approach to identify the dynamic treatment effects of bond authorization on local housing prices, student achievement, and district composition. Our results indicate that California school districts underinvest in school facilities: passing a referendum causes immediate, sizable increases in home prices, implying a willingness to pay on the part of marginal homebuyers of $1.50 or more for each $1 of capital spending. These effects do not appear to be driven by changes in the income or racial composition of homeowners, and the impact on test scores appears to explain only a small portion of the total housing price effect.

Copyright/Permission Statement

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The Quarterly Journal of Economics following peer review. The version of record is available online at: http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/125/1/215.short

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 27 November 2017

This document has been peer reviewed.