How do Behavioral Approaches to Increase Savings Compare? Evidence from Multiple Interventions in the U.S. Army
Date of this Version
Information provision, choice simplification, social messaging, active-choice frameworks, and automatic enrollment all increase retirement savings. However, gauging the relative efficacy of these approaches is challenging because the supporting evidence derives from diverse populations over a long period. In this study, we leverage experimental and quasi-experimental variation in a constant setting, the U.S. military, to examine the effects of nearly two dozen experiments for four leading policy options (i.e., information emails, action steps, target contribution rates, active choice, and automatic enrollment) designed to increase retirement savings. Consistent with the previous literature, we find sizable effects on participation and cumulative contributions that increase with the intensity of the intervention. We then exploit cost data to complete the first cost-effectiveness analysis in the literature. Our analysis suggests that active choice programs are the most cost-effective method to generate new program participation and contributions for small, medium, and large firms, while automatic enrollment is more cost-effective for very large firms.
retirement saving, behavioral messaging, automatic enrollment, choice simplification, servicemembers, active choice, action steps
Working Paper Number
The project described received funding from the TIAA Institute and Wharton School’s Pension Research Council/Boettner Center.
The content is solely the responsibility of the author(s) and does not represent official views of the United States Military Academy, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, the TIAA Institute or Wharton School’s Pension Research Council/Boettner Center. © 2020 Pension Research Council of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved.
Date Posted: 09 March 2021