Date of this Version
Using a theoretical life cycle model, we evaluate how much workers benefit from having the option to hire a financial advisor when it is costly for employees to rebalance their own financial portfolios. Results indicate that having access to a financial advisor at the start of one’s career can be quite beneficial increasing certainty equivalent consumptions by 1.1%. If delegation to an advisor is available only a decade after entering the labor market, the benefit of delegation is cut by half, and it falls further if delegation is available only later in life (at age 60). We also examine whether simpler target date funds and fixed weight portfolios benefit consumers, compared to the outcomes with customized financial advice. We find that the simpler portfolio products would need to be provided at zero cost, in order to benefit consumers as much as having access to a financial advisor.
Portfolio inertia, life cycle saving, household finance, human capital, financial advice
G11, D14, D91
Working Paper Number
Opinions, findings, interpretations, and conclusions represent the views of the authors and not those of the affiliated institutions. All findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this paper represent the views of the authors and not those of the Wharton School or the Pension Research Council. © 2016 Pension Research Council of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved.
Date Posted: 05 March 2019