Document Type
Working Paper
Date of this Version
1-1-2004
Abstract
Canada’s multi-pillar retirement income system includes a public pension pillar with both a poverty reduction program for the elderly funded out of general tax revenues, and a pay-as-you-go earnings-related income replacement program. Reforms implemented to partially fund the latter have probably increased the financial sustainability of Canada’s public pension scheme, at least for the medium term. A second, relatively large, pillar of the nation’s retirement income system consists of voluntarily provided employersponsored pensions. As employers adapted to the changing context of the last decade or so, two tendencies gradually became discernable: a slow decline in registered pension plan coverage, and a complementary shift from defined benefit to defined contribution pension arrangements, many of which allow employees to make investment decisions. Recent large unfunded pension liabilities among the former, coupled with the inherent riskiness of savings arrangements of the latter type, suggest growing retirement income insecurity for working Canadians.
Working Paper Number
WP2004-15
Copyright/Permission Statement
©2004 Pension Research Council of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Date Posted: 30 August 2019
Comments
The published version of this Working Paper may be found in the 2005 publication: Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm.