Wharton Pension Research Council Working Papers
 

Document Type

Working Paper

Date of this Version

1-1-2004

Abstract

We compare older workers’ plans for work and retirement with their subsequent work and retirement outcomes using panel data from the Health and Retirement Study. Among those with retirement plans, about half indicate they would like to cut back on their work hours or otherwise change the type of work they do prior to, or instead of, fully retiring. Yet the fraction that follows through on these alternative plans is dramatically lower than the fraction that realizes plans to stop working. Our analysis shows that individuals who likely would need to change jobs in order to reduce their work hours are much less likely to have plans to reduce hours and, conditional on having such plans, are much less likely to follow through on them. Instead, a large fraction of these individuals stops working entirely. Our findings suggest that older workers may face substantial barriers to job change, and we conclude with a discussion of potential policy implications.

Comments

The published version of this Working Paper may be found in the 2005 publication: Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm.

Working Paper Number

WP2004-03

Copyright/Permission Statement

©2004 Pension Research Council of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.

Included in

Economics Commons

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 30 August 2019