Title
Retirement Preparedness and Financial Literacy in Singapore: How Do the Self-Employed Compare?
Document Type
Working Paper
Date of this Version
1-22-2019
Abstract
Policymaker and media attention has recently focused on the rise of the so-called “gig” or freelance employment sector, where workers lack formal long-term relationships with one specific firm. This topic has captured public interest partly because of concern that those engaged in nontraditional work arrangements may lack the opportunity to save in formal retirement plans. This paper examines how the self-employed in Singapore compare to regular employees as well as the unemployed in terms of retirement preparedness, retirement saving, and portfolio diversification. We also investigate the extent to which differences in financial literacy can account for the different behaviors across types of workers. Overall, we find that the self-employed and employees save and invest remarkably similarly. Financial literacy is quite important: respondents scoring one additional correct answer on the FinLit questions have about 3% more net financial wealth, 2% more nonhousing net wealth, and 14% more total wealth than their less savvy counterparts. More financially literate individuals also hold better diversified portfolios over the life cycle.
Keywords
gig economy, financial literacy, investment, household portfolios, pension, Central Provident Fund, retirement, saving
JEL Code
D14, E21, G11, J32
Working Paper Number
WP2019-01
Copyright/Permission Statement
All opinions are solely those of the authors. © 2019 Koh and Mitchell. All rights reserved.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge excellent programming assistance from Yong Yu and the Singapore Life Panel (SLP®) team at Singapore Management University, as well as the RAND SLP® team.
Date Posted: 12 February 2019
Comments
The research was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Academic Research Fund Tier 3 grant with the MOE’s official grant number MOE2013-T3-1-009, the Singapore Management University, and the Pension Research Council/Boettner Center at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.