Author(s)

Suyoung BaekFollow

Date of this Version

5-12-2020

Advisor

Samuel Freeman

Keywords

philosophy, deepfakes, marketplace of ideas, free speech

Abstract

The threat of deepfakes is well-documented in the existing literature. Deepfake technology has emerged as a powerful tool with which vulnerable individuals could easily become targets of novel forms of exploitation and sabotage. Additionally, deepfakes’ unique capacity to distort people’s sense of reality exacerbates truth decay. The growing influence of social media and our deep-rooted cognitive biases further escalate the harms of deepfakes. Despite these apparent concerns, scholars have noted that the regulation of deepfakes confronts a constitutional challenge in the American context, stemming from Supreme Court cases such as New York Times v. Sullivan and U.S. v. Alvarez. In both cases, the Court emphasized the importance of protecting false speech on the grounds that it constitutes an integral part of the “marketplace of ideas.” This paper aims to show how the broad range of harms posed by deepfakes in the digital age calls for a departure from employing the Times and Alvarez approaches to assessing the constitutionality of deepfakes.

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted:12 May 2020

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.