Download Full Text (888 KB)
Today, unlike in years past, labor is much more likely to be viewed as the victim and not the perpetrator of an antitrust violation, and there is increasing recognition that firm behavior can negatively affect wages, restrict worker mobility, and otherwise harm the interests of workers. Pretty much all the labor-related antitrust litigation of the last 20 years has involved problematic agreements or arrangements among employers, from which labor deserves protection.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics | Collective Bargaining | Economic Policy | Economics | Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Labor Economics | Labor Relations | Unions
labor market monopsony, wage stagnation, mergers, non-compete agreements, anti-poaching agreements, labor market concentration, unions, anti-trust
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Collective Bargaining Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Labor Economics Commons, Unions Commons