A New Coalescence in the Housing Finance Reform Debate?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Wharton Public Policy Initiative Issue Briefs
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
housing finance reform
Fannie Mae
Freddie Mac
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Housing and Economic Recovery Act
Johnson-Crapo bill
Economic Policy
Public Policy
Real Estate
Funder
Grant number
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Next Steps in the Housing Finance Reform Saga (https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v3n2.php)
A New Coalescence in the Housing Finance Reform Debate? (https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v4n6.php)
Author
McCoy, Patricia A
Contributor
Abstract

In the wake of the stalled Johnson-Crapo bill, the overarching goal of housing finance reform continues to be the efficient provision of long-term fixed-rate mortgages to credit-worthy borrowers in all markets throughout the business cycle.This Issue Brief analyzes three newly-proposed plans for reforming the U.S. housing finance system: (1) a proposal from Jim Parrot et al. to merge Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into a new government corporation; (2) Andrew Davidson’s proposal for mutual ownership of the GSEs by mortgage originators; and (3) an opposing plan from Mark Calabria, arguing against securitization altogether and for a return to the regime of originate-and-hold.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2016-06-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection