PARC Working Paper Series

Document Type

Working Paper

Date of this Version

12-19-1997

Comments

Recommended citation:

Behrman, Jere. R. and Mark R. Rosenzweig. 1997. "“Ability” Biases in Schooling Returns and Twins: A Test and New Estimates." PARC Working Paper Series, WPS 97-12.

This working paper was published in a journal:

Behrman, Jere R. and Mark R. Rosenzweig. 1999. ""Ability" Biases in Schooling Returns and Twins: A Test and New Estimates." Economics of Education Review 18(2):159-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(98)00033-8.

Abstract

Identical twins long have been used to control for “ability” in efforts to obtain unbiased estimates of the earnings impact of schooling and of biases in estimates that do not control for earnings endowments. This study (1) presents new estimates of schooling returns and of “ability” bias using a new twins sample, (2) develops and applies a test of the significance of that bias, and (3) demonstrates that there may be “ability” bias even if the genetically-endowed component of ability does not affect schooling decisions directly as long as this component of ability is correlated with other family characteristics such as income that do affect schooling and that it is not possible to identify separately these individual components of “ability” bias. The basic empirical result is that, net of measurement error, upward “ability” bias is statistically significant in OLS estimates, causing an overestimate of the schooling impact of 12%.

Keywords

analysis of education, human capital formation, occupational choice, labor productivity

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 02 March 2020