Local Residential Sorting and Public Goods Provision: A Classroom Demonstration

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Operations, Information and Decisions Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
classroom experiments
public goods
residential sorting
tiebout hypothesis
Economic Theory
Education Economics
Other Education
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Brouhle, Keith
Corrigan, Jay
Croson, Rachel
Farnham, Martin
Garip, Selhan
Habodaszova, Luba
Johnson, laurie T
Johnson, Martin
Reiley, David
Contributor
Abstract

This classroom exercise illustrates the Tiebout (1956) hypothesis that residential sorting across multiple jurisdictions leads to a more efficient allocation of local public goods. The exercise places students with heterogeneous preferences over a public good into a single classroom community. A simple voting mechanism determines the level of public good provision in the community. Next, the classroom is divided in two, and students may choose to move between the two smaller communities, sorting themselves according to their preferences for public goods. The exercise places cost on movement at first, then allows for costless sorting. Students have the opportunity to observe how social welfare rises through successive rounds of the exercise, as sorting becomes more complete. They may also observe how immobile individuals can become worse off because of incomplete sorting when the Tiebout assumptions do not hold perfectly.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2005-01-01
Journal title
The Journal of Economic Education
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection