Date of this Version
Research in Nursing & Health
The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is used widely, but issues with reliability have been evident. Cronbach alpha coefficient is usually used to assess reliability, but this approach assumes a unidimensional scale. The purpose of this article is to address the dimensionality and internal consistency reliability of the SCHFI. This was a secondary analysis of data from 629 adults with heart failure enrolled in three separate studies conducted in the northeastern and northwestern United States. Following testing for scale dimensionality using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability was tested using coefficient alpha and alternative options. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that: (a) the Self-Care Maintenance Scale has a multidimensional four-factor structure; (b) the Self-Care Management Scale has a two-factor structure, but the primary factors loaded on a common higher-order factor; and (c) the Self-Care Confidence Scale is unidimensional. Reliability estimates for the three scales, obtained with methods compatible with each scale's dimensionality, were adequate or high. The results of the analysis demonstrate that issues of dimensionality and reliability cannot be separated. Appropriate estimates of reliability that are consistent with the dimensionality of the scale must be used. In the case of the SCHFI, coefficient alpha should not be used to assess reliability of the self-care maintenance and the self-care management scales, due to their multidimensionality. When performing psychometric evaluations, we recommend testing dimensionality before assessing reliability, as well using multiple indices of reliability, such as model-based internal consistency, composite reliability, and omega and maximal reliability coefficients.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Barabaranelli, C., Lee, C.S., Vellone, E., & Riegel, B. (2014). Dimensionality and Reliability of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Scales: Further Evidence from Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Research in Nursing & Health 37, no. 6: 524-237], which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21623. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Self Care, United States
Barbaranelli, C., Lee, C. S., Vellone, E., & Riegel, B. (2014). Dimensionality and Reliability of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Scales: Further Evidence from Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 37 (6), 524-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21623
Cardiology Commons, Cardiovascular Diseases Commons, Circulatory and Respiratory Physiology Commons, Health Services Research Commons, Medical Humanities Commons, Nursing Commons, Preventive Medicine Commons
Date Posted: 06 August 2018
This document has been peer reviewed.