Date of this Version
The American Historical Review
IN THIS ESSAY, we offer a new synthesis of American business history that aims to replace, but also subsume, the dominant Chandlerian framework. Writing in the mid-1970s, Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., attributed the success of the U.S. economy in the twentieth century to the rise of large, vertically integrated, managerially directed enterprises in the nation's most important industries. These enterprises, Chandler argued, were dramatically more efficient than the small, family-owned and managed firms that previously had characterized the economy. Where small firms were dependent on the market to coordinate their purchases of raw materials and the sale of their output, large firms took on these supply and marketing functions themselves, using hierarchies of salaried managers to coordinate them administratively. This visible hand of management, Chandler claimed, represented such a vast improvement over the invisible hand of the market that firms that developed these capabilities were able not only to dominate their own industries but to diversify into other sectors of the economy and attain positions of power there as well.
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The American Historical Review following peer review. The version of record Lamoreaux, N.R., Raff, D.M.G., Temin, P. (2003), "Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History". The American Historical Review, 108(2), 404-433, Oxford Academic Press, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/108.2.404
Lamoreaux, N. R., Raff, D., & Tamin, P. (2003). Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History. The American Historical Review, 108 (2), 404-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ahr/108.2.404
Date Posted: 19 February 2018
This document has been peer reviewed.