Date of this Version
We formalize the idea that when managers require external investment to expand, higher-skilled firms will be more likely to diversify in equilibrium, even though managers can exploit asymmetric information about their ability to raise capital from investors. We exploit the timing of new fund launches in the hedge fund industry to distinguish between agency and capability effects in firm product diversification decisions, using a large survivor-bias-free panel data set on the hedge fund industry from 1994 to 2006. Empirically we show that diversifying firms' excess returns are high relative to those of other firms prior to diversification and fall within firm following diversification, but are six basis points higher per month per unit of risk ex post compared to a matched sample of focused firms. The evidence suggests that managers exploit asymmetric information about their own ability to time diversification decisions; yet, the discipline of markets ensures that better firms diversify, on average. The results provide large-sample empirical evidence that agency effects and firm capabilities jointly influence diversification decisions.
organizational studies, strategy, financial institutions, investment, economics, econometric dynamics
de Figueiredo, R. P., & Rawley, E. (2011). Skill, Luck, and the Multiproduct Firm: Evidence From Hedge Funds. Management Science, 57 (11), 1963-1978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1389
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Economics Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons
Date Posted: 27 November 2017
This document has been peer reviewed.