Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice
Penn collection
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Business
Cognition and Perception
Cognitive Psychology
Marketing
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract
Most economists define rationality in terms of consistency principles. These principles place "bounds" on rationality—bounds that range from perfect consistency to weak stochastic transitivity. Several decades of research on preferential choice has demonstrated how and when people violate these bounds. Many of these violations are interconnected and reflect systematic behavioral principles. We discuss the robustness of thes violations and review the theories that are able to predict them. We further discuss the adaptive functions of the violations. From this perspective, choices do more than reveal preferences; they also reflect subtle, yet often quite reasonable, dependencies on the environment.