Procuring Fast Delivery: Sole Sourcing with Information Asymmetry

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Marketing Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
mechanism design
reverse auctions
supply chain coordination
game theory
renegotiation
Business
Business Administration, Management, and Operations
Business Analytics
Business and Corporate Communications
Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Marketing
Operations and Supply Chain Management
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Cachon, Gérard P
Zhang, Fuqiang
Contributor
Abstract

This paper studies a queuing model in which a buyer sources a good or service from a single supplier chosen from a pool of suppliers. The buyer seeks to minimize the sum of her procurement and operating costs, the latter of which depends on the supplier’s lead time. The selected supplier can regulate his lead time, but faster lead times are costly. Although the buyer selects the supplier to source from (possibly via an auction) and dictates the contractual terms, the buyer’s bargaining power is limited by asymmetric information: The buyer only has an estimate of the suppliers’ costs, while the suppliers know their costs precisely. We identify a procurement mechanism that minimizes the buyer’s total cost (procurement plus operating). This mechanism is not simple: It is a numerically derived nonlinear menu of contracts. Therefore, we study several simpler mechanisms: e.g., one that charges a late fee and one that specifies a fixed lead-time requirement (no menus, no nonlinear functions). We find that simple mechanisms are nearly optimal (generally within 1% of optimal) because asymmetric information conveys significant protection to the supplier, i.e., the supplier is able to retain most of the benefit of having a lower cost. Renegotiation is another concern with the optimal mechanism: Because it does not minimize the supply chain’s cost, the firms can be both better off if they throw away the contract and start over. Interestingly, we find that the potential gain from renegotiation is relatively small with either the optimal or our simple mechanisms. We conclude that our simple mechanisms are quite attractive along all relevant dimensions: buyer’s performance, supply chain performance, simplicity, and robustness to renegotiation.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2006-06-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection