Scholarship at Penn Libraries

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of this Version

12-7-2020

Publication Source

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Volume

7

Start Page

165

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00647-z

Abstract

The current mechanisms by which scholars and their work are evaluated across higher education are unsustainable and, we argue, increasingly corrosive. Relying on a limited set of proxy measures, current systems of evaluation fail to recognize and reward the many dependencies upon which a healthy scholarly ecosystem relies. Drawing on the work of the HuMetricsHSS Initiative, this essay argues that by aligning values with practices, recognizing the vital processes that enrich the work produced, and grounding our indicators of quality in the degree to which we in the academy live up to the values for which we advocate, a values-enacted approach to research production and evaluation has the capacity to reshape the culture of higher education.

Keywords

research evaluation, academe, metrics, humanities

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 17 March 2022

This document has been peer reviewed.