Proposed Work Requirements in Pennsylvania Medicaid: Characterizing Eligible Beneficiaries

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Issue Briefs
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Medicaid
work requirements
Pennsylvania
Funder
Grant number
Copyright date
Distributor
Author
Polsky, Daniel
Chatterjee, Paula
Chen, Xinwei
Weiner, Janet
Contributor
Abstract

Using information from all 2.9 million Pennsylvania Medicaid enrollees as of April 1, 2016, we identified the 815,763 working-age adults (ages 21-64) and assessed their likely exemption and working status over the course of the subsequent year. More than half would likely be exempt from work requirements because of their caregiver status (38%) or disability status (14%). Thirty-one percent would be nonexempt but considered working, with at least one month of work; this group had either part-time or full time work 95% of the time they were enrolled in Medicaid. This snapshot suggests that more than 80% of working-age adults were already working or disabled or potential caregivers and thus, while still subject to compliance verification that the Department will need to administer and enforce, are unlikely to substantially benefit from work requirements. Our results, as visualized below, show that 11% (90,194) of working-age enrollees (815,763) subject to administration and verification of the work requirement program would be found to be nonexempt, not working and on Medicaid for at least a year. This group, representing just 3% of the 2.9 million Medicaid enrollees, would have the greatest potential to change their work status as a result of the program. The burden and cost of implementation to the 815,763 would have to be weighed against the benefit to the 90,194 to determine whether, among current beneficiaries, the benefits of such a program outweigh the costs.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2019-02-08
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection