A Policy Analysis of the Federal Growth Model Pilot Program's Measures of School Performance: The Florida Case

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
GSE Graduate Student Research
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Education
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Education Policy
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Weiss, Michael J
May, Henry
Contributor
Abstract

As test-based educational accountability has moved to the forefront of national and state education policy, so has the desire for better measures of school performance. No Child Left Behind's (NCLB) status and safe harbor measures have been criticized for being unfair and unreliable, respectively. In response to such criticism, in 2005 the federal government announced the Growth Model Pilot Program, which permits states to use projection models (a type of growth model) in their accountability systems. This article uses historical longitudinal data from a large school district to empirically show the inaccuracy of one state's projection model, to demonstrate how projection models are very similar to NCLB's original status measure, and to contrast projection models with value-added models. As policy makers debate the reauthorization of NCLB, this research can provide guidance on ways to improve the current measurement of school performance.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2012-01-01
Journal title
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Weiss, M. J., & May, H. (2012). A policy analysis of the federal growth model pilot program's measures of school performance: The Florida case. Education Finance and Policy, 7(1), 44-73. doi: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00053 © Association for Education Finance and Policy and MIT Press. Education Finance and Policy can be found online at http://www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/edfp/7/1
Recommended citation
Collection