Trash-Talking: Competitive Incivility Motivates Rivalry, Performance, and Unethical Behavior

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Finance Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Incivility
rivalry
competition
effort
motivation
cheating
ethics
creativity
aggression
communication
conflict
negotiation
cooperation
Business
Finance and Financial Management
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Yip, Jeremy A
Schweitzer, Maurice E
Nurmohamed, Samir
Contributor
Abstract

Trash-talking increases the psychological stakes of competition and motivates targets to outperform their opponents. In Studies 1 and 2, participants in a competition who were targets of trash-talking outperformed participants who faced the same economic incentives, but were not targets of trash-talking. Perceptions of rivalry mediate the relationship between trash-talking and effort-based performance. In Study 3, we find that targets of trash-talking were particularly motivated to punish their opponents and see them lose. In Study 4, we identify a boundary condition, and show that trash-talking increases effort in competitive interactions, but incivility decreases effort in cooperative interactions. In Study 5, we find that targets of trash-talking were more likely to cheat in a competition than were participants who received neutral messages. In Study 6, we demonstrate that trash-talking harms performance when the performance task involves creativity. Taken together, our findings reveal that trash-talking is a common workplace behavior that can foster rivalry and motivate both constructive and destructive behavior.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2017-07-24
Journal title
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection