Regulation of Digital Businesses with Natural Monopolies or Third-Party Payment Business Models: Antitrust Lessons from the Analysis of Google

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Finance Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
antitrust
bundling and tying
contestability
deterred market entry
digital business strategies
essential facilities doctrine
Google
key word auctions
online search
relevant market share
sponsored search
Business
Finance and Financial Management
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Clemons, Eric K
Madhani, Nehal
Contributor
Abstract

Some digital business models may be so innovative that they overwhelm existing regulatory mechanisms, both legislation and historical jurisprudence, and require extension to or modification of antitrust law. Regulatory policies that were developed in response to nineteenth- or twentieth-century antitrust concerns dealt principally with economies of scale leading to monopoly power and may not be well suited to the issues of network effects or third-party payer online business models such as sponsored search. From the perspective of information systems economics, we investigate if such third-party payer digital systems require intervention as profound as the government's innovative approach to the problems posed by AT&T in the 1913 Kingsbury Commitment, establishing the first private regulated monopoly. Google provides an example of a company whose innovative digital business model is difficult to fit into current regulatory frameworks, and may provide examples of the issues that might require an extension to regulatory policy.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2010-01-01
Journal title
Journal of Management Information Systems
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection