Profiling is Politically 'Correct': Agent-Based Modeling of Ethno-Political Conflict

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Departmental Papers (ESE)
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
political simulation
agent-based models
personality profiling
policy analysis tools
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Bharathy, Gnana K
Nye, Benjamin
Contributor
Abstract

A holy grail for military, diplomatic, and intelligence analysis is a valid set of software agent models that act as the desired ethno-political factions so that one can test the effects that may arise from alternative courses of action in different lands. This article enumerates the challenges of such a testbed and describes best-of-breed leader and follower profiling models implemented to improve the realism and validity of the agent. Realistic, 'descriptive' agents are contrasted to rational actor theory in terms of the different equilibria one would expect to emerge in conflict games. These predictions are examined in two real world cases (Iraq and SE Asia) where the agent models are subjected to validity tests and a policy experiment is then run. We conclude by arguing that substantial effort on game realism, best-of-breed social science models, and agent validation efforts is essential if analytic experiments are to effectively explore conflicts and alternative ways to influence outcomes. Such efforts are likely to improve behavioral game theory as well.

Advisor
Date of presentation
2007-11-26
Conference name
Departmental Papers (ESE)
Conference dates
2023-05-17T01:22:12.000
Conference location
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Postprint version. To be Presented at Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference 2007, November 2007, 11 pages.
Recommended citation
Collection