Neglected Ends: Clinical Ethics Consultation and the Prospects for Closure

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Center for Bioethics Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
bioethics
clinical ethics
medical ethics
Bioethics and Medical Ethics
Medicine and Health Sciences
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

Clinical ethics consultations (CECs) are sometimes deemed complete at the moment when the consultants make a recommendation. In CECs that involve actual ethical conflict, this view of a consult’s endpoint runs the risk of overemphasizing the conflict’s resolution at the expense of the consult’s process, which can have deleterious effects on the various parties in the conflict. This overly narrow focus on reaching a decision or recommendation in consults that involve profound moral disagreement can result in two types of adverse, lingering sequelae: moral distress or negative moral emotions. The problem, succinctly named, is that such consults have insufficient “closure” for patients, families, and providers. To promote closure, and avoid the ills of moral distress and the moral emotions, I argue that CECs need to prioritize assisted conversation between the different stakeholders in these conflicts, what is often referred to as “bioethics mediation.”

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2014-05-27
Journal title
The American Journal of Bioethics
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in The American Journal of Bioethics, January 2015, http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15265161.2014.974770.
Recommended citation
Collection