No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKable, Joseph W
dc.contributor.authorCaulfield, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorFalcone, Mary K
dc.contributor.authorMcConnell, Mairead H
dc.contributor.authorBernardo, Leah
dc.contributor.authorAudrain-McGovern, Janet
dc.contributor.authorParthasarathi, Trishala
dc.contributor.authorHornik, Robert
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorAshare, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorLerman, Caryn
dc.contributor.authorDiefenbach, Paul J
dc.contributor.authorLee, Frank J
dc.date2023-05-17T19:08:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T00:37:11Z
dc.date.available2018-02-02T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-02
dc.date.submitted2017-12-05T12:44:22-08:00
dc.description.abstractIncreased preference for immediate over delayed rewards and for risky over certain rewards has been associated with unhealthy behavioral choices. Motivated by evidence that enhanced cognitive control can shift choice behavior away from immediate and risky rewards, we tested whether training executive cognitive function could influence choice behavior and brain responses. In this randomized controlled trial, 128 young adults (71 male, 57 female) participated in 10 weeks of training with either a commercial web-based cognitive training program or web-based video games that do not specifically target executive function or adapt the level of difficulty throughout training. Pretraining and post-training, participants completed cognitive assessments and functional magnetic resonance imaging during performance of the following validated decision-making tasks: delay discounting (choices between smaller rewards now vs larger rewards in the future) and risk sensitivity (choices between larger riskier rewards vs smaller certain rewards). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no evidence that cognitive training influences neural activity during decision-making; nor did we find effects of cognitive training on measures of delay discounting or risk sensitivity. Participants in the commercial training condition improved with practice on the specific tasks they performed during training, but participants in both conditions showed similar improvement on standardized cognitive measures over time. Moreover, the degree of improvement was comparable to that observed in individuals who were reassessed without any training whatsoever. Commercial adaptive cognitive training appears to have no benefits in healthy young adults above those of standard video games for measures of brain activity, choice behavior, or cognitive performance. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Engagement of neural regions and circuits important in executive cognitive function can bias behavioral choices away from immediate rewards. Activity in these regions may be enhanced through adaptive cognitive training. Commercial brain training programs claim to improve a broad range of mental processes; however, evidence for transfer beyond trained tasks is mixed. We undertook the first randomized controlled trial of the effects of commercial adaptive cognitive training (Lumosity) on neural activity and decision-making in young adults (N = 128) compared with an active control (playing on-line video games). We found no evidence for relative benefits of cognitive training with respect to changes in decision-making behavior or brain response, or for cognitive task performance beyond those specifically trained.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/44435
dc.legacy.articleid1015
dc.legacy.fields10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2832-16.201
dc.legacy.fulltexturlhttps://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=psychology_papers&unstamped=1
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
dc.source.beginpage7390
dc.source.endpage7402
dc.source.issue16
dc.source.issue31
dc.source.journalDepartmental Papers (Psychology)
dc.source.journaltitleThe Journal of Neuroscience
dc.source.peerreviewedtrue
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.source.volume37
dc.subject.otherCognitive Training
dc.subject.otherdelay discounting
dc.subject.otherimpulsivity
dc.subject.otherneuroimaging
dc.subject.otherworking memory
dc.subject.otherPsychology
dc.titleNo Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance
dc.typeArticle
digcom.date.embargo2018-02-02T00:00:00-08:00
digcom.identifierpsychology_papers/16
digcom.identifier.contextkey11201953
digcom.identifier.submissionpathpsychology_papers/16
digcom.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1838df49-8cd2-4787-be23-ee91eeb8bab5
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc258a579-9187-4789-a4d5-2cb5802d8ce8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1ced2d0e-2fa4-4a93-827b-66fec3ace908
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc258a579-9187-4789-a4d5-2cb5802d8ce8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication74737806-ba38-4f0b-8ac5-7b0b380e0fb4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1ced2d0e-2fa4-4a93-827b-66fec3ace908
relation.isAuthorOfPublication74737806-ba38-4f0b-8ac5-7b0b380e0fb4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1838df49-8cd2-4787-be23-ee91eeb8bab5
upenn.schoolDepartmentCenterDepartmental Papers (Psychology)
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
No_Effect_of_Commercial_Cognitive_Training_on_Brain_Activity__Choice_Behavior__or_Cognitive_Performance.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collection
Articles